Q: I’ve noticed a curious dearth of references to the “American Dream” among most libertarian writers. Sometimes it seems like libertarians would be more interested in seeing seasteading succeeding. Why don’t libertarians care about the American Dream?
~
Tibor Machan points out that we have to be clear just which American Dream we’re talking about.
A: Now and then one hears or reads reference to “the American Dream,” as if there was just one such thing. In fact, however, what is uniquely American is just that Americans are supposed to be free to dream their own dreams, pursue their own happiness as they understand it, instead of falling in line with what some elite or the government declares to be everyone’s prime concern.
Very loosely the American dream refers to a certain measure of prosperity, including home and vehicle ownership, along with what makes this possible, namely, a decent line of work, a productive job. These are broadly enough definable so that they do not amount to a one-size-fits-all idea for one to have to buy into. Just like happiness, to the pursuit of which all human beings have a right (as per the Declaration of Independence), the American dream can vary enormously from person to person. It is, however, the American dream because of that very fact, while the dreams of citizens elsewhere tend to be forced or nudged into alignment with the dreams of their political or cultural leaders.
When I first came to the United States of America, I was 17 and a half years old and was very involved in learning about America. I did this even before arriving here, mostly by reading novels by the likes of Zane Gray, Erle Stanley Garner, Mark Twain, and others who were famous among the young even outside of the country. Thinking back on it, I cannot identify any one thing that the novels of these authors agreed on would qualify as the American dream. Certainly nothing specific, nothing concrete. At most they conveyed the notion that in America men and women prize their liberty and prefer taking on the job of governing their own lives as they see fit. Yes, if this is meant by the American dream, there was something like it in the air wherever one came across Americans and their stories, real or fictional. It seemed to me back then that Americans stood out by not concerning themselves with following the herd, with doing routinely what their neighbors did, with reaching some kind of standard of life considered to be the average or mean. They had their own standards of success, or at least they projected this as Americans. And that is one main reason I set my eyes on coming to live here. The envy-driven concern about equality just seemed absent here, while it dominated the countries under the thumb of the Soviets, for example.
Sadly much of this has changed. Now talk of the American dream tends to imply wanting everyone to be equally well of as everyone else is, the dream of egalitarianism. If some have it very good, well, then it’s unjust that others don’t. Never mind setting out on one’s own path, as an artist, engineer, banker, architect, soldier or whatever, because one of those fulfills one’s personal aspirations. That would be the old version of the American dream, at least as I understood it.
But truth be told I and others like me who came here from abroad, even from such hell holes as the communist countries were, didn’t worry much about some American dream, not if it had anything to do with some one-size-fits-all blueprint to be implemented in one’s life. No, it was mostly all about doing what one wants to do, pursuing one’s personal dream, one’s own, if you will, American dream. And respecting the rights of others do likewise.
Of course, America didn’t quite live up to this more sensible rendition of “the dream” since many were still disenfranchised, even oppressed, who lived here. But comparatively speaking America made plenty of room for the pursuit of one’s dream and still does, judging by how many millions across the globe want to come here to live and work even in the midst of difficult economic times and how many want its institutions emulated. No doubt, there is ample dissent afoot about this, as well. And some would actually embark upon remaking America according to the dictates of certain religious books and leaders. Even while they see the value of economic opportunity in this country, they do not connect it with its basic political philosophy of individualism and individual rights.
For me living my own American dream will do just fine, even if others want to impose something quite different. I just hope my children and indeed all children will still find it possible to do this in the future.
~
Tibor Machan is an adviser to Freedom Communications on libertarian issues. He is a professor at the Argyros School of Business and Economics at Chapman University, where he holds the R.C. Hoiles Chair in Business Ethics and Free Enterprise. He is also a Hoover Institution research fellow.
Gov. Jerry Brown and the state's Democratic leaders had warned that California taxpayers needed to pay...
We were disappointed in the county Board of Supervisors for putting forward a budget that cuts 5 percent...
About the only thing government can't track right now seems to be home-schoolers, despite a recent...
The decision to permanently close the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station on the Southern California coast brings to an end an extended and contentious debate about how to proceed after the station was......
With Independence Day approaching – and with the federal government demonstrating more contempt for the nation's founding principles by the day – this is as good a time as any for Americans to......
Also: Iranian democracy; Arming Syria's rebels...
HUNTINGTON BEACH, Clem Dominguez: While cities are using the federal crackdown as an excuse to ban pot shops in Orange County, the real problem is the Controlled Substances Act ["Marijuana battle losing......

![]() |
E-mail to letters@ocregister.com. Please provide your name, the city where you live and telephone number (telephone numbers will not be published). Letters of about 200 words will be given preference. Letters will be edited for length, grammar and clarity. | ||
Joy Pullmann: Home schooling exaggerated
Tom LaTourrette: San Onofre risk factors
Troy Senik: Politicians come and go; bureaucracy is forever
Victor Davis Hanson: Subverting the government they pledged to serve
Editorial: A qualified victory for voting rights
Editorial: California budget gets a breatherWe look for timely and well written op-eds on public policy issues, especially state and local. We give preference to local writers.
Libertarians are all about achieving “The American Dream”, since freedom is the only way it can happen. It is all we talk about, although we are likely to recognize it is “The Human Dream” rather than belonging exclusively to any one “nation”. We are the only ones with a real plan for actually reaching your dreams: Pursue what is important to you while you allow others the same freedom, and don’t harm any innocent person while you chase your rainbows. Imagine doing and having what is most important to YOU. Then make it happen regardless of government obstacles.
I wonder it Tibor ever bothered to read Alexis de Toqueville’s vision of what it means to be American? He may find it directly in contradiction with the part he so easily dismisses off hand because he read a few novels as a boy.
The true American dream involves more than a little aspect of everybody being the same in many senses, as well as the freedom to achieve whatever you are big enough to dream and achieve.
The tension between those two ends is what makes America great. Self serving dismissal of half the story on the basis of some novels read 50 years ago or more is not very helpful to the reader here.
Tibor has bothered, even has written on De Toqueville’s work in his latest book, The Promise of Liberty (2009). I mentioned some novels but my reasoning doesn’t depend on these alone. Nor would I dismiss them, given that some were written by Mark Twain, Zane Gray, and other heavies in American literature. Moreover, my piece is a short response to a question, not a book or even scholarly paper. (I reluctantly comment on this post because it is insulting–characterizing mine as “self-serving dismissal” without any evidence that it is any such thing.)
I suggest that “Barry” consider that equality of opportunity does not result in “everybody being the same” which is neither an American value nor one that rings of Liberty in my ears.
If you’d like everyone to be the same, the communists seem to be very good at producing equality of misery. I’d gladly trade the opportunity to fail or succeed on my own merit for government-enforced “equality”.